At the request of Iran, the Argentinean and the Iranian Foreign Ministries agreed to hold a dialogue about improving their estranged relationship at the UN General Assembly in September. These two countries have had chilly relations since the Argentinean justice system found Iran and its proxy, Hezbollah, to be the main culprits responsible for the deadly attacks on the Jewish Community Headquarters (AMIA) in July 1994 that left 85 people dead and hundreds of others wounded. In 1992 a similar attack, presumably orchestrated by Iran, took place against the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires. In both attacks, most victims, (with the exception of four Israelis trapped in the Embassy), were Argentinean civilian citizens.
As a result of the dialogue in New York, three meetings took place between the Argentinians and the Iranians this past October in. While each nation’s strategic goals have never been disclosed to the public, the Argentinians defined the meetings as “very positive” but provided no explanation to justify such a claim.
Interestingly enough, after the meetings with the Argentinians, the Iranians issued a statement declaring their innocence regarding the 1992 and 1994 attacks against Jewish targets in Buenos Aires. However, this is not particularly surprising; Iran continues to mislead the entire world with its public willingness to dialogue over its nuclear program. Likewise, the Iranians have refused, so far, to even acknowledge that they are trying to develop a military nuclear capability.
Nobody would have seriously thought that the Iranians were going to acknowledge their role in the terrorist attacks in Argentina or agree to extradite those accused by the Argentinean justice ministry of having been complicit in the attack. Entertaining those thoughts is particularly ridiculous when the current Iranian Minister of Defense, Ahmad Vahidi, is himself one of the accused. Furthermore, Mr. Vahidi, by virtue of his own position, has control over Iran’s regular armed forces, and, most importantly, the Revolutionary Guards, who at the same time oversee Iran’s terrorist operations abroad.
Another key accused is Moshne Rabbani, a cultural attaché in Argentina during the AMIA attack and now in charge of expanding Iran’s and Hezbollah’s recruitment and training of operatives in Latin America.
All of these factors make the success of these bi-lateral negotiations an almost impossible task. The question is, what prompted the initiation of this dialogue and what did each country hope to gain?
One possible objective can be explained by common sense: Iran is isolated and economically damaged by international sanctions. Argentina has, however, already increased its level of trade with Iran, despite the AMIA case. By 2008 bilateral trade between Argentina and Iran had dramatically increased from $30 million to $1.2 billion as part an Iranian trade offensive. Furthermore, according to Jaime Daremblum of the Hudson Institute, Argentina and Brazil are responsible for 96% of Latin American exports to Iran.
If Iran’s goal were to merely increase trade, it would not need to establish a dialogue with Argentina over the AMIA case, which is a hot potato for them, anyway.
Perhaps the explanation might be found in other, more ideological reasons.
Argentina has established a very strong alliance with President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, who is Iran’s closest ally after Syria. The alliance between Cristina Kirchner and Hugo Chavez is not only a relationship based on the convenience associated with Chavez’s oil and debt relief generosity; it is also an ideological and symbolic alliance that ties their political fates together, as Kirchner views Chavez as a symbol of the left’s strength and legitimacy in the region. It is no wonder that the Venezuelan National Electoral Council’s announcement of the Venezuelan elections was broadcasted live in Argentina in all the TV networks controlled by the government.
Of course, for the extreme left associated with the countries of the Bolivarian Alliance, Iran is a symbol of anti-Americanism and anti-Western resistance. Increasingly, the moderate left has also flirted with Iran: Brazil went out of its way to try to cut a deal on Iran’s nuclear program mostly in favor of Iran; Uruguay (another moderate left-wing government that sympathizes with Chavez but is not officially a member of the Bolivarian Alliance) sent a Congressional delegation to Iran more for symbolic and political objectives than for commercial reasons.
Kirchner has often said that her government is an active part of the struggle of Latin America against Western corporate interests. It is against this background that Kirchner might have been susceptible to the pressure of the environment that she, herself, helped create. Thus, reconciliation with Iran would place Argentina in full ideological harmony with the Bolivarian Alliance.
The expanding status of Iran as a political symbol of the Bolivarian Alliance’s anti-Americanism and the legitimacy Iran has gained in the non-Bolivarian left is a dangerous development.
Argentina’s motivation to seek reconciliation with Iran might well be motivated by this Bolivarian euphoria and left wing triumphalism that has turned more regional.
As pointed out in my last article, the governments of Brazil and Argentina, even more so than other Latin American countries, view the power of the left as a victorious regional movement that transcends national experiences. The Left is defined in the abstract and there is no distinction between the social democracies of the moderate left and the authoritarian elected governments of the Bolivarian Alliance.
Most likely, these Argentinean-Iran talks will benefit Iran. While the countries of the West are trying to isolate it, many Latin American countries are doing just the opposite. The Kirchner government, despite its declared sympathy with the victims of the terrorist attacks, does not like to be told what to do, particularly, not by the Americans or the Israelis. This was made clear by the Argentinean Foreign Minister Hector Timmerman a few months ago when rumors about the possibility of such dialogue began to surface. For Argentina is a declaration of independence from the dictates of the giant of the North. For Iran, it could be a major political and moral victory.
Against this background it would behoove the United States Administration to closely monitor the Argentina-Iran dialogue.
THE AMERICAS REPORT
NANCY MENGES and
LUIS FLEISCHMAN, Editors
The Americas Report is the featured product of the Center for Security Policy‘s Menges Hemispheric Security Project. It features in-depth, original articles on subjects not regularly covered by the American press.
Search The Americas Report
Browse By Topic
- Central American Countries (4)
- Latin American Countries (236)
- Middle East (24)
- Podcast (1)
- #Brasil Rousseff, con apoyo popular del 10%, dice estar deprimida y continúa victimizándose April 29, 2016La presidente brasileña admitió la posibilidad inminente de perder su mandato en un juicio político. La votación que podría separarla de su cargo está prevista para la segunda semana de mayo. La presidente afirma que hay un golpe parlamentario en curso y niega haber cometido un "crimen de responsabilidad" al utilizar dinero de los bancos […]
- #Cuba Still a Brutal Dictatorship – by Mauricio Claver-Carone April 29, 2016Supporters of President Obama's policy of unconditional engagement with the Castro dictatorship are in a terrible bind after last week's VII Cuban Communist Party Congress ("Congress"). The Congress served a healthy dose of anti-American rhetoric, lambasting President Obama and referring to the United States as "the enemy." So what was the reaction of Obama's supporters? […]
- #Uruguay 25 años del Mercosur – por Jorge Batlle April 28, 2016La familia ideológica del Mercosur fracasó económicamente en el momento más esplendoroso de la economía en los países emergentes, altísimos precios de soja, de cobre, de hierro, de leche, de carne, bajísimos precios de importación de artículos industriales y cero de interés, hasta el día de hoy, en el dólar. Se manejaron como si fueran […]
- #Uruguay Sobre el antisemitismo – por Julio María Sanguinetti April 28, 2016Pasan los días y aunque la sociedad uruguaya ha reaccionado ante el asesinato de David Fremd con la debida sensibilidad, sigue siendo más necesario que nunca reflexionar sobre el mal generalizado que hay detrás del episodio y que no es otro que el prejuicio antijudío (antisemita, como suele decirse). Nadie podría hoy dudar de que […]
- #Argentina Escraches a ex funcionarios fuertemente acusados de corrupción April 27, 2016Los escraches a funcionarios públicos del gobierno de Cristina Fernández de Kirchner parecen haberse multiplicado en Argentina. Esta vez le tocó el turno a Carlos Zannini, ex secretario legal y técnico de la presidencia durante doce años. La percepción de la ciudadanía sobre los niveles de corrupción y descaro del gobierno pasado parece estar empeorando […]
- #Mundo Régimen chino censuró a Papi Jiang, una de sus videoblogueras más famosas April 19, 2016La censura china borró de internet los videos de la famosa bloguera Papi Jiang, quien con más de 100 millones de visitas se había convertido recientemente en una de las grandes sensaciones virales de la red con monólogos en los que ironizaba sobre la vida cotidiana del gigante asiático usando un lenguaje sarcástico.
- #Brasil Paliza al Foro de San Pablo: Diputados aprueban destitución de Rousseff April 18, 2016Histórico: Más de dos tercios, de un total de 513 diputados brasileros, votaron hoy domingo en favor de la destitución de la presidente Dilma Rousseff. Un paso más hacia la cárcel de la presidente y de Lula Da Silva, fuertemente acusados de corrupción y malversación millonaria de fondos públicos.
- #Uruguay Corte Suprema declaró inconstitucional otro artículo de la ley de medios April 12, 2016#Uruguay Golpe al Frente Amplio: La Corte Suprema de Uruguay explicó que la distribución de la publicidad para los partidos políticos en función de los votos no se ajusta a la carta magna. 131 artículos, de un total de 202 ya han sido impugnados por inconstitucionales.
- #Bolivia Gabriela Zapata, la “novia del poder” sigue complicando a Morales y sus ministros April 12, 2016Gabriela Zapata, madre de un hijo del presidente Evo Morales, posa con muy poca ropa y muchos lujos en fotos enviadas al Ministro Juan Ramón Quintana. El Gobierno habló de un complot en el caso de tráfico de influencias que complica cada día más al partido de Evo Morales y sus ministros.
- #Brasil Temerosa y al borde de la destitución, Rousseff habla de conspiración April 12, 2016#Brasil Temerosa y al borde de la destitución, Rousseff habla de conspiración y golpe de Estado: La presidente enfrenta una votación decisiva en la Cámara de Diputados, que el próximo domingo deberá decidir si motoriza o no el juicio político en su contra.
- #Brasil Rousseff, con apoyo popular del 10%, dice estar deprimida y continúa victimizándose April 29, 2016