By Luis Fleischman
The recent Gaza crisis, during which Israel responded with a limited military operation to stop Hamas missile attacks against Israeli populations, unleashed a number of reactions by intellectuals in Latin America.
Some of these reactions were expected but others raise serious concerns about the direction Latin America is taking in what is called “the battle of ideas”.
The reaction to the Gaza crisis by some intellectuals reflects the ideological power of the Bolivarian Revolution and the challenge this revolution will present for us in the future.
This time we did not hear mere pacifist statements calling to stop the bloodshed. We heard a much more aggressive discourse that accused Israel of conducting genocide on the Palestinians; promoting expansionism; committing war crimes; and nothing short of serving the devil.
These types of accusations are not new and certainly not new for the left. However, if we carefully analyze what guides the viewpoint of these intellectuals the story is hair-rising. Not for the nonsense they say about Israel but rather because of the sources they draw from and its significance in the context of the current political situation in Latin America.
For example, Eduardo Galeano is a Uruguayan writer who became famous at a young age when he wrote “The Open Veins of Latin America”, a humorous account of Latin American economic history viewed as systematic exploitation of natural resources by developed countries and imperial powers. Since the transition to democracy in Uruguay, he has become a public intellectual, mostly representing the left. He is often a guest on national TV. He comes across as having a great sense of humor and warmth and remains a popular figure. He is close to the political circles of President Jose Mujica.
In reaction to the recent events in Gaza, Galeano launched a strong and vicious attack on Israel, to which I responded here in Spanish.
Galeano not only attacks Israel’s specific action but also claims that Israel was built at the expense of the Palestinians and continues to expand. What is curious about Galeano is that he literally uses elements drawn directly from Arab propaganda and distortion. Using the most vicious Arab propaganda he claims “the persecution of the Jews has been an old European habit but in the last half century this historical debt has been charged to the Palestinians who have never been anti-Semitic. Furthermore, they are Semitic themselves.” Galeano suggests that Israelis kill civilians on purpose, “knowing exactly what they are doing”. The military industry is “successfully testing (its equipment) in this operation of ethnic cleansing”. In another passage Galeano argues that the threat of a nuclear Iran is an invention of the pro-American media and that the real nuclear threat comes from the Americans because they burned Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The international community is repudiated by what Galeano calls another “piece of theater put on by the United States”.
Another intellectual who follows this same line of thought is Atilio Boron, an Argentinian columnist for a major national daily, a PhD from Harvard University and a person very close to the political circles of President Cristina Kirchner.
Boron accuses Israel of being a terrorist, murderous and a “scoundrel” state. He defines Israel as being far more evil than Al Qaeda. He quotes from fanatic Arab sources that claim that Israel manipulates the Europeans, the Egyptians and the entire world community, including President Barack Obama in order to keep its stand.(I have responded to Boron in Spanish here) )
What is interesting is that Mr. Boron accuses Israel of murdering civilians but in regard to Syria he claims that the uprising against the tyranny of President Bashar Al Assad is nothing more than an “imperialist conspiracy”. Boron implies that the Syrian regime, that has already killed more than 40,000 people, is not a murderous regime but it is a victim. He also holds Israel responsible for increasing tensions with Iran, despite the fact that it was Iran that broke off diplomatic relations with Israel 30 years ago. Iran has also expressed its desire to destroy Israel, and has sponsored terrorist activities against it. Furthermore, using language drawn directly from Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and even Neo-Nazis, Boron blasts Israel for using the Holocaust as a way to blackmail the world.
Of course, they both justify Hamas hostility against Israel because Israel is the “repressor”. Hamas is not at fault and its past suicide bombers against Israeli civilians or the bombardments of Israeli populations are not mentioned. The fact that Israel withdrew from Gaza seven years ago or offered peace concessions that were rejected altogether by the Palestinians does not seem to be important either.
What is important is that Israel is a U.S. ally. They detest American power with all their might.
But the most astonishing public figure and intellectual is the Nobel Prize laureate from Argentina, Adolfo Perez Esquivel. Mr. Perez Esquivel received the prestigious prize for his activism on behalf of human rights. He strongly opposed the Argentinean and other Latin American dictatorships during the 1970’s and 80’s and became a star during a dark time where tragic events where occurring in the Southern Cone of Latin America. Like the previous public intellectuals I mentioned he blames Israel for the conflict in Gaza, calls it a “terrorist state” and initiated a letter calling for a boycott of Israel. He drew on people like Noam Chomsky and 50 other like-minded individuals to participate in this effort.
In an article published on November 20th, Perez Esquivel wrote the following paragraph: “When will the international community stop allowing Israel to act with impunity, without attempting to limit its aggression against the Palestinian people? When will the United States and the European Union stop being part of the aggression against the people of the Middle East, Palestine, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq? When will they stop threatening Iran?
As the European Union received the Nobel Prize, Perez Esquivel repudiated the European countries’ intervention in the conflict in Libya and warned them of intervening in Syria, as well. Of course, this human rights activist does not mention that in both the case of Syria and Libya, we are talking about murderous dictators that launched a merciless war against their own people.
But Perez Esquivel is even more nefarious. In a letter directed to President Obama after the killing of Osama Bin Laden last year, he questioned why the U.S. didn’t capture Bin laden and try him in a court of justice. Then he answered his own question by suggesting that Bin Laden probably knew information that the United States did not want him to disclose. Thus, several paragraphs later, Perez Esquivel tells the U.S. president: “You know that there are people who have investigated the tragic events of 9/11/2001 and claim there is evidence that this was a self-coup (self-inflicted attack)”
Perez Esquivel continues “This event was the perfect excuse to launch a war against Afghanistan and Iraq and now against Libya”. In the same letter the human rights activist and Nobel Laureate accused the United States of committing the worst atrocities in the world to keep world power. Finally, he calls the U.S. an “axis of evil”.
These three intellectuals are strong supporters of Hugo Chavez and his Bolivarian Revolution. They also support the half -century old Cuban dictatorship. While three decades ago they were active in the struggle for democracy in the Southern cone, they now have no problem supporting Hugo Chavez, a putschist who in the name of economic and social justice subjugated the judicial power; limited freedom of the press; persecuted opponents; organized Para-military groups to intimidate people and potential opponents; who now controls the electoral council and has forced thousands of Venezuelans into exile. This is without mentioning Venezuela’s attempt to destroy the Human Rights Commission of the Organization of American States.
Galeano, Boron and Perez Esquivel are not just identified as bloggers or anonymous fanatics that run colorful website pages. These are opinion leaders who are respected in their societies.
But the most important point is that they are public intellectuals that not merely support the Bolivarian Revolution in its political form. They are also part of its ideology including the anti-imperialist lunacy, the admiration for tyrants and the delirious and venomous conspiracy theories that this revolution wishes to propagate.
In past writings, I mentioned how Chavismo will survive without Chavez and showed how this will most likely happen in Venezuela. I also mentioned that the Bolivarian revolution has absorbed many elements of the left, including moderate elements, and is gradually succeeding in achieving a regional unified message in what seems to be a continental movement of the left.
Now, the case of these three public figures shows that the Bolivarian Revolution has established its hegemony in the form of ideas and prejudices that will be very difficult to remove in the years to come. The Post-Chavez era will survive as a movement because it no longer depends on Chavez’s personal well-being for its ideological survival.
All this shows that ideas matter and that the intellectual left in Latin America has and continues to have an enormous impact influencing the thinking of large segments of their societies. Since the United States has retreated from communicating our ideas and values, many old notions about the U.S. as an exploitive and expansionist power still hold sway in the minds of many Latin Americans. By not taking seriously or participating in the political and ideological debate, our side will never be heard and freedom and democracy in Latin America will suffer as a consequence.
THE AMERICAS REPORT
NANCY MENGES and
LUIS FLEISCHMAN, Editors
The Americas Report is the featured product of the Center for Security Policy‘s Menges Hemispheric Security Project. It features in-depth, original articles on subjects not regularly covered by the American press.
Search The Americas Report
Browse By Topic
- Central American Countries (7)
- Latin American Countries (247)
- Middle East (25)
- Podcast (1)
- #Bolivia Emergencia: Marchan por la falta de agua potable en seis de nueve departamentos December 3, 2016La ineptitud y la corrupción han impactado en el suministro de agua en seis de un total de nueve departamentos en Bolivia, incluyendo la ciudad de La Paz, donde ya no hay agua para consumo de sus habitantes. El partido de Evo Morales, Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS) que dice procurar cientos de servicios "sociales" a […]
- #Colombia A pupitrazo limpio – por Plinio Apuleyo Mendoza December 3, 2016Fue grande el engaño. Enterados de que se estaba trabajando duramente en La Habana para hacer los ajustes solicitados por los expresidentes Uribe y Pastrana, llegamos a pensar que la derrota del Sí había obrado en Santos un saludable efecto. Pero hasta ahí llegó la fina cortesía de Santos. Fríamente anunció que el acuerdo era […]
- #Cuba Prohibido reír, escuchar música, bailar o tomar durante 9 días November 29, 2016El régimen dictatorial de Cuba prohibió a la ciudadanía realizar cualquier tipo de festividad durante los nueve días que dure el duelo decretado en el país por la muerte de Fidel Castro. Entre otras cosas, no se podrá mostrar alegría, escuchar música ni tomar alcohol en público. La represión y la intolerancia continúan sin pausa.
- #Cuba Celebraciones en Miami por la muerte de Fidel Castro November 26, 2016#Cuba Miles de personas se congregan en la calle 8 de Miami, núcleo del movimiento anticastrista, para celebrar una noticia que llevaban mucho tiempo esperando: la muerte del dictador, traidor y asesino, Fidel Castro.
- #Cuba Murió el dictador Fidel Castro: La historia no lo absolverá – por Carlos Alberto Montaner November 26, 2016#Cuba Murió el dictador Fidel Castro: Carlos Alberto Montaner responde 4 preguntas clave sobre el infame dictador: ¿Qué rasgos psicológicos le dieron forma y sentido a su vida, motivando su conducta de conquistador revolucionario, cruce caribeño entre Napoleón y Lenin? ¿Cómo era el mundo en que se formó? ¿En qué creía? ¿Cuál es el balance […]
- #Mexico Enrique Peña Nieto: “Queremos privilegiar el diálogo con Donald Trump para una nueva agenda” November 19, 2016#Mexico En la Cumbre de la APEC en Lima, el Presidente Enrique Peña Nieto afirmó: "Queremos privilegiar el diálogo con Donald Trump para una nueva agenda". Y agregó "El libre comercio ha deparado a prácticamente buena parte de las economías mundiales mayor desarrollo, mayor crecimiento económico, mayor inclusión social", dijo. "México es un ferviente creyente […]
- #Colombia Santos entra en pánico con la elección de Donald Trump – por Mary O’Grady November 14, 2016#Colombia Santos tiene prisa, necesita salirse con la suya antes que Obama termine su mandato. Que le haya llevado al gobierno seis años de negociaciones para firmar el acuerdo con los terroristas de las FARC al que los colombianos le dijeron “NO” y se haya tomado apenas seis semanas para enmendarlo, pone a prueba su […]
- #EEUU Histórico triunfo Republicano en la Casa Blanca, Senado y Diputados November 9, 2016La candidata Hillary Clinton gastó más del doble de dinero en campaña, tuvo a Barack Obama y a la primera dama de los Estados Unidos haciendo campaña para ella con el dinero de los contribuyentes, tuvo a la amplia mayoría de los medios del mundo, a Wall Street, a las compañías financieras, y a la […]
- #Colombia Sin carroza, ni plata, ni paz, ni luz – por Juan Lozano November 8, 2016Sr. Presidente, andan diciendo que usted está muy afanado para poderse llevar el acuerdo listo a la hora de recibir el Nobel y hablar con el Papa. Ojalá se lograra. Pero si el diálogo avanza bien, no vuelva a cometer el mismo error de forzar acuerdos finales a la carrera que arriesgan todo lo logrado. […]
- #Opinion The New Political ism: Egalitarianism – by José Azel November 8, 2016Fascism and Nazism were defeated in World War II. Communism and Socialism were presumably defeated in the Cold War, but they have mutated into a new political ism: egalitarianism. In Equal is Unfair, Don Watkins and Yaron Brook make the case that modern egalitarianism evolves as a comeback to the failure of communism for those […]
- #Bolivia Emergencia: Marchan por la falta de agua potable en seis de nueve departamentos December 3, 2016
- Niños del Estado Islámico asesinan a 25 soldados siriosYihadistas publican video donde aparecen las víctimas de rodillas y en fila en el escenario del teatro romano de Palmira
- Fidel reaparece en reunión de maestros queserosSostuvo un amplio intercambio de más de cuatro horas con 19 maestros queseros en un instituto en el poblado del Guatao
- Enrique Iglesias complace a miles de fansCon I like it, el cantante finalizó su concierto de anoche
- Kutcher y Mila Kunis se casarían este fin de semanaSegún el portal estadounidense Page Six, la pareja dará el sí en una ceremonia privada en Los Angeles
- Niños del Estado Islámico asesinan a 25 soldados sirios