A significant but under-reported meeting of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) took place on January 28 and 29th in Havana, Cuba.
CELAC is an organization created in order to promote regional integration. It includes almost all the Latin American and Caribbean countries but excludes the United States and Canada. It is also a political organization, created in Caracas in 2011 and inspired by the late Venezuelan president, Hugo Chavez whose implicit aim was to diminish the influence of the Organization of American States (OEA) and the United States.
This summit had strong political connotations with implications for the future of the region. Several key resolutions were adopted.
First, CELAC affirmed the right of each nation to choose any type of “political and economic organization”. By the same token CELAC affirmed its support for the principle “of self-determination, respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of each country; and; support for the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign countries”.
It is interesting that in the same resolution, even in the same sentence, CELAC expresses support for the “protection and promotion of all human rights, respect for the rule of law at the national and international levels and the promotion of citizens’ participation and democracy”.
This first resolution then continues “ we are also committed to work together for the prosperity of all, in such a way that all forms of discrimination, inequality, marginalization, violations of human rights and the rule of law be eradicated”.
Of course this main resolution of CELAC is clearly ambiguous and misleading even though it looks perfectly acceptable to the naked eye. However, if we look carefully, we can see that CELAC is asking that the international community and the region accept any form of political or economic regime chosen by each member country while calling for non-interference in that countries’ internal affairs. In other words, what CELAC is requesting is that if a country chooses to become a dictatorship, it should be accepted without questioning. The principle of sovereignty and self-determination stands above the principle of human rights or liberty.
It is no wonder that the resolution does not call to protect “human rights” but “all human rights”. This language is problematic as it implies that human rights are not just violations of the right to life and liberty but also “social rights” which are fundamentally the right to an income or the right to economic equality.
It is not that social rights are to be dismissed but what would happen if in the name of social rights, human and civil rights are violated?
We can find the answer in the next paragraph where the resolution implies that if prosperity for all is achieved, problems of human rights will be eradicated.
In other words, economic prosperity is directly tied to the diminishing of violations of rights (which for CELAC includes “inequality” as a main component). Common sense tells us that if inequality is indeed a socio-economic problem, civil and human rights are tied to the rule of law independently of economic performance. However, for CELAC the constitutionality and legal character of rights seems to be subjected to economic performance and reduction of inequality.
Thus, CELAC is in fact legitimizing dictatorship.
It is no wonder that leaders from all over the continent visited the old leader of the Cuban revolution, Fidel Castro as if the Caribbean dictator were the Dalai Lama or the Pope. All the presidents, one after another, were there to receive the blessing of the old man. The list included Presidents Dilma Roussef (Brazil), Cristina Kirchner (Argentina), Jose Mujica (Uruguay), Enrique Pena Nieto (Mexico), and, of course the presidents of the countries of the Bolivarian alliance (Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Nicaragua).
These meetings actually took place when human rights in Cuba continue to be practically non-existent. In other words there is no freedom of the press, of free speech, and no elections on a municipal or national level. Cuba continues to be a fifty-five year old Communist, anti-American dictatorship that has impoverished the vast majority of its people.
In Cuba there are political prisoners detained without any fair trial. Today, we have a remarkable group of wives of political prisoners called the Ladies in White (Las Damas de Blanco”). This group protests every day in downtown Havana demanding the release of their husbands. The “Ladies in White” follow the model of the “Mothers of Plaza de Mayo”, a group of mothers that during the 1977-1983 military dictatorship in Argentina demanded information about their children who disappeared during that dark time. The “Ladies in White”, like other peaceful opponents of the regime, are constantly subjected to harassment by the Cuban security forces. Likewise, the prison system in Cuba has been described by human rights organizations as “cruel, inhuman and degrading”. The Cuban government continues to refuse to cooperate with the International Red Cross and other humanitarian bodies.
We should not forget the case of Alan Gross, a U.S government sub-contractor for the U.S Agency for International Development (USAID). He was falsely accused of crimes against the Cuban state for bringing computer equipment to Cuba’s Jewish community. He has been a prisoner in Cuba for the last four years and since 2011 he is serving a 15year sentence.
The number of political prisoners has doubled, according to a report by the Miami Herald from a year ago.
Of the 33 leaders at CELAC, only the outgoing Chilean president Sebastian Piñera met with representatives from the “Ladies in White”. In another such gesture, Costa Rica received in its Havana embassy a delegation of Cuban dissidents.
What is worse, the Cuban government is exporting its repression tactics to newly elected dictatorships such as Venezuela.
However, CELAC managed to condemn the U.S. economic blockade against Cuba.
In response, the U.S. State Department rightly accused Latin American countries of “betraying democracy” by giving diplomatic support to Cuba. Even the well- known and widely circulated Spanish leftist newspaper “El País” suggested that the CELAC summit was a farce that only served to legitimize the Castro dictatorship and increase its political capital.
But as a result of the CELAC summit not only the Cuban dictatorship was legitimized but also, all forms of authoritarianism were given legitimacy. That means that no undemocratic country or violator of human rights (as long as he belongs to the “social equalizer” camp) will be condemned or reprimanded by the region.
Secondly, this tendency was reaffirmed by the position of the Mexican government and the European Union.
Mexican President Pena Nieto met with Castro, and contrary to his two predecessors Felipe Calderon and Vicente Fox, totally ignored the dissidents. Pena Nieto also called Castro “Cuba’s moral and political leader” and proceeded to renew relations between the two countries that suffered a breakdown in their relationship (mostly over human rights) since 2002.
Likewise, the European Union announced that it would deepen relations with Cuba. On February 10th, 28 European foreign ministers are expected to give a green light to begin talks with Havana in order to increase trade, investment and dialogue on human rights. I have my doubts that the stubborn Cuban regime will even agree to discuss human rights but it will certainly benefit from European investments. Europe is expected to look for its own economic and political interests. What is worse the EU announcement is a major political victory for the Cuban regime.
Here again, the United States is a passive observer having failed to develop a sound human rights agenda and establish a suitable Latin American policy. Instead, the U.S. has adapted to the “natural” course of events dictated by the likes of Hugo Chavez, Raul Castro, Evo Morales and Rafael Correa.
Luis Fleischman is co-editor of The Americas Report and the author of the book, “Latin America in the Post-Chavez Era: The Security Threat to the United States.”
THE AMERICAS REPORT
NANCY MENGES and
LUIS FLEISCHMAN, Editors
The Americas Report is the featured product of the Center for Security Policy‘s Menges Hemispheric Security Project. It features in-depth, original articles on subjects not regularly covered by the American press.
Search The Americas Report
Browse By Topic
- Central American Countries (4)
- Latin American Countries (236)
- Middle East (24)
- Podcast (1)
- #Brasil Rousseff, con apoyo popular del 10%, dice estar deprimida y continúa victimizándose April 29, 2016La presidente brasileña admitió la posibilidad inminente de perder su mandato en un juicio político. La votación que podría separarla de su cargo está prevista para la segunda semana de mayo. La presidente afirma que hay un golpe parlamentario en curso y niega haber cometido un "crimen de responsabilidad" al utilizar dinero de los bancos […]
- #Cuba Still a Brutal Dictatorship – by Mauricio Claver-Carone April 29, 2016Supporters of President Obama's policy of unconditional engagement with the Castro dictatorship are in a terrible bind after last week's VII Cuban Communist Party Congress ("Congress"). The Congress served a healthy dose of anti-American rhetoric, lambasting President Obama and referring to the United States as "the enemy." So what was the reaction of Obama's supporters? […]
- #Uruguay 25 años del Mercosur – por Jorge Batlle April 28, 2016La familia ideológica del Mercosur fracasó económicamente en el momento más esplendoroso de la economía en los países emergentes, altísimos precios de soja, de cobre, de hierro, de leche, de carne, bajísimos precios de importación de artículos industriales y cero de interés, hasta el día de hoy, en el dólar. Se manejaron como si fueran […]
- #Uruguay Sobre el antisemitismo – por Julio María Sanguinetti April 28, 2016Pasan los días y aunque la sociedad uruguaya ha reaccionado ante el asesinato de David Fremd con la debida sensibilidad, sigue siendo más necesario que nunca reflexionar sobre el mal generalizado que hay detrás del episodio y que no es otro que el prejuicio antijudío (antisemita, como suele decirse). Nadie podría hoy dudar de que […]
- #Argentina Escraches a ex funcionarios fuertemente acusados de corrupción April 27, 2016Los escraches a funcionarios públicos del gobierno de Cristina Fernández de Kirchner parecen haberse multiplicado en Argentina. Esta vez le tocó el turno a Carlos Zannini, ex secretario legal y técnico de la presidencia durante doce años. La percepción de la ciudadanía sobre los niveles de corrupción y descaro del gobierno pasado parece estar empeorando […]
- #Mundo Régimen chino censuró a Papi Jiang, una de sus videoblogueras más famosas April 19, 2016La censura china borró de internet los videos de la famosa bloguera Papi Jiang, quien con más de 100 millones de visitas se había convertido recientemente en una de las grandes sensaciones virales de la red con monólogos en los que ironizaba sobre la vida cotidiana del gigante asiático usando un lenguaje sarcástico.
- #Brasil Paliza al Foro de San Pablo: Diputados aprueban destitución de Rousseff April 18, 2016Histórico: Más de dos tercios, de un total de 513 diputados brasileros, votaron hoy domingo en favor de la destitución de la presidente Dilma Rousseff. Un paso más hacia la cárcel de la presidente y de Lula Da Silva, fuertemente acusados de corrupción y malversación millonaria de fondos públicos.
- #Uruguay Corte Suprema declaró inconstitucional otro artículo de la ley de medios April 12, 2016#Uruguay Golpe al Frente Amplio: La Corte Suprema de Uruguay explicó que la distribución de la publicidad para los partidos políticos en función de los votos no se ajusta a la carta magna. 131 artículos, de un total de 202 ya han sido impugnados por inconstitucionales.
- #Bolivia Gabriela Zapata, la “novia del poder” sigue complicando a Morales y sus ministros April 12, 2016Gabriela Zapata, madre de un hijo del presidente Evo Morales, posa con muy poca ropa y muchos lujos en fotos enviadas al Ministro Juan Ramón Quintana. El Gobierno habló de un complot en el caso de tráfico de influencias que complica cada día más al partido de Evo Morales y sus ministros.
- #Brasil Temerosa y al borde de la destitución, Rousseff habla de conspiración April 12, 2016#Brasil Temerosa y al borde de la destitución, Rousseff habla de conspiración y golpe de Estado: La presidente enfrenta una votación decisiva en la Cámara de Diputados, que el próximo domingo deberá decidir si motoriza o no el juicio político en su contra.
- #Brasil Rousseff, con apoyo popular del 10%, dice estar deprimida y continúa victimizándose April 29, 2016